Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 51: 143-147, 1981;
8750-7587/81 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trippenbach, T.
Right arrow Articles by Mozes, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trippenbach, T.
Right arrow Articles by Mozes, R.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 51, Issue 1 143-147, Copyright © 1981 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effects of airway occlusion at functional residual capacity in pentobarbital-anesthetized kittens

T. Trippenbach, R. Zinman and R. Mozes

The effects or airway occlusion at the end of inspiration on timing parameters and the "integrated" phrenic activity were studied in 1- to 21-day-old kittens at two levels of pentobarbital anesthesia before and after bilateral vagotomy. In intact kittens during the first 2 wk of life, instead of the classical effects of airway occlusion at functional residual capacity (FRC), shortening of both inspiration and expiration, a decrease in amplitude and rate of rise of the integrated phrenic activity, or augmented breaths were recorded. These effects were not altered by an additional dose of pentobarbital sodium. In kittens of all ages, airway occlusion performed after bilateral vagotomy had no significant effects on either timing and phrenic activity. Therefore, vagally mediated reflexes are probably responsible for the paradoxical effects of airway occlusion at FRC. However, a possible contribution of the chest wall receptors cannot be excluded.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online