Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 50: 348-357, 1981;
8750-7587/81 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hirsch, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hirsch, J.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 50, Issue 2 348-357, Copyright © 1981 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Single motor unit activity in the diaphragm of cat during pressure breathing

B. Bishop, S. Settle and J. Hirsch

In this study we analyzed the breath-by-breath activity of single motor units in the diaphragm slip of allobarbital-anesthetized cats during quiet breathing and during continuous positive- and negative-pressure breathing. Our objective was to determine whether single motor units, on the basis of their activities, can be separated into discrete subpopulations or whether they fall on a continuum analogous to that of motor units of hindlimb muscles. The firing profiles of each unit were characterized for each pressure level by the onset and peak firing frequencies, onset latency, duration of firing, number of impulses per breath, and minimal frequency, when appropriate. Units with shorter onset latencies had higher peak frequencies, longer firing durations, and increased firing frequencies than did units with longer onset latencies. These comparative relationships persisted even though the activity of every motor unit was altered during pressure breathing. During positive-pressure breathing onset latencies were lengthened, and durations of firing were shortened with little change in onset or peak frequencies. Late units might be silenced. During negative-pressure breathing onset latencies were shortened, and durations of firing were lengthened, sufficiently in some cases to fill the expiratory pause. In addition, previously inactive units were recruited late in inspiration for short, relatively high frequency bursts during inspiration. The results support the concept that the phrenic motoneuron pool is comprised of three discrete subpopulations.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online