Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 49: 881-887, 1980;
8750-7587/80 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharya, A.
Right arrow Articles by Greenleaf, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharya, A.
Right arrow Articles by Greenleaf, J. E.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 49, Issue 5 881-887, Copyright © 1980 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Body acceleration distribution and O2 uptake in humans during running and jumping

A. Bhattacharya, E. P. McCutcheon, E. Shvartz and J. E. Greenleaf

Body acceleration distribution and its relation to the mode of generation were determined in eight young males (19-26 yr) who walked and ran on a treadmill operated at four speeds and jumped on a trampoline at four heights. With increasing treadmill speed, peak acceleration at the ankle (Aa = 3.0-12.0 Gz) always exceeded that at the back and forehead (Ab = 0.9-5.0 Gz, and Ah = 0.8-3.9 Gz); these acceleration profiles included higher frequency components than those during jumping. Corresponding ranges of oxygen uptake (VO2) and heart rate (HR) were 0.8-3.0 l/min and 90-180 beats/min, respectively. With increasing jumping height, acceleration levels were more symmetrically distributed (Aa = 3.0-7.0 Gz, Ab = 3.9-6.0 Gz, and Ah = 3.0-5.6 Gz); VO2 and HR ranges were 1.1-2.5 l/min and 102-175 beats/min, respectively. VO2 was linearly related to HR for both types of exercise. The results indicate that, for similar levels of HR and VO2, the magnitude of the biomechanical stimuli is greater with jumping on a trampoline than with running, a finding that might help identify acceleration parameters needed for the design of remedial procedures to avert deconditioning in persons exposed to weightlessness.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online