Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 49: 846-850, 1980;
8750-7587/80 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hales, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hales, C. A.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 49, Issue 5 846-850, Copyright © 1980 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Stability of alveolar hypoxic vasoconstriction with intermittent hypoxia

M. A. Miller and C. A. Hales

Repeated intermittent global hypoxia has been reported to markedly enhance hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in dogs. We have reexamined this phenomenon but with intermittent unilateral alveolar hypoxia, avoiding complications of systemic hypoxemia. Fifteen anesthetized dogs were intubated with a double-lumen endotracheal tube, allowing separate ventilation of one lung with 100% N2 as a hypoxic challenge and the other lung with 100% O2 to maintain adequate systemic oxygenation. Distribution of lung perfusion was determined with intravenous 133Xe and external chest detectors. Each dog alternately breathed air or the unilateral alveolar hypoxia combination for 15 min each for a total of 12 hypoxic challenges or 6 h. Two groups emerged on the basis of the strength of their vasoconstrictor responses to successive hypoxic challenge. In group I (n = 6), perfusion to the hypoxic lung decreased 29% with the first challenge and decreased comparably with successive challenges. In group II, vasoconstriction was initially weak with perfusion decreasing only 5%, but perfusion decreased further with time alone (n = 5) or successive challenges (n = 4), falling 35% on the 12th challenge (comparable to group I). Delayed achievement of hypoxic vasoconstriction in group II may be secondary to a vasodilating prostanoid that disappears with time.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online