Journal of Applied Physiology Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 49: 784-788, 1980;
8750-7587/80 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sawka, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by von Luhrte, T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sawka, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by von Luhrte, T. C.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 49, Issue 5 784-788, Copyright © 1980 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Metabolic and circulatory responses to wheelchair and arm crank exercise

M. N. Sawka, R. M. Glaser, S. W. Wilde and T. C. von Luhrte

To compare metabolic and circulatory responses for wheelchair ergometer (WERG) and arm crank ergometer (ACE) exercise at equal power-output (PO) levels, wheelchair-dependent (n = 7) and able-bodied (n = 10) subjects exercised at PO levels at 30, 90, 150, and 210 kpm times min-1 for each mode of ergometry. Steady-state values of oxygen uptake (VO2), pulmonary ventilation (VE), ventilatory equivalent of oxygen (VE times VO2-1), cardiac output (Q), stroke volume (SV), arteriovenous oxygen difference (a-VO2), heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and rate pressure product (RPP) were determined at each PO. With the exception of VE times VO2-1 and a-VO2, each variable tended to increase with PO. Generally, VO2, VE, Q, SV, HR, SBP, and RPP responses were higher for WERG than ACE exercise at each PO level. When Q and RPP were expressed in relation to VO2, both variables were higher for WERG exercise. These data suggest that the wheelchair hand-rim system is inherently more strenuous than arm cranking, and that the latter should be studied further as an alternative method for wheelchair propulsion.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
G. Mukherjee, P. Bhowmik, and A. Samanta
Physical fitness training for wheelchair ambulation by the arm crank propulsion technique
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2001; 15(2): 125 - 132.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
C. E Beekman, L. Miller-Porter, and M. Schoneberger
Energy Cost of Propulsion in Standard and Ultralight Wheelchairs in People With Spinal Cord Injuries
Physical Therapy, February 1, 1999; 79(2): 146 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online