Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 49: 708-714, 1980;
8750-7587/80 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, E. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, E. P.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 49, Issue 4 708-714, Copyright © 1980 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effect of plasma carbonic anhydrase on ventilation in exercising dogs

S. M. Lewis and E. P. Hill

Recent studies suggest pH sampled by arterial chemoreceptors may not equal that sampled by external pH electrodes, because the uncatalyzed hydration of CO2 in plasma is a slow reaction (t 1/2 approximately 9 S). The importance of this reaction rate to ventilatory control (particularly during exercise) is not known. We studied the effect of catalyzing the CO2-pH reaction in three awake exercising dogs with chronic tracheostomies and carotid loops; the dogs were trained to run on a treadmill. Respiration frequency, tidal volume, total ventilation, and end-tidal partial pressure of CO2 (PCO2) were continuously monitored. Periodically, carotid artery blood was drawn and analyzed for partial pressure of O2 (PO2), PCO2, pH, and plasma carbonic anhydrase (CA) activity. Measurements were made during steady-state exercise (3 mph and 10% grade), during a control period, after injection of a 5 ml bolus of saline, and after injection of 5 mg/kg of bovine CA dissolved in 5 ml of saline. This dose of CA increased the reaction rate by more than 80-fold. Neither the control nor the CA injections significantly altered the ventilatory parameters. Saline and CA date differed by less than 5% in ventilation, 1 Torr in arterial PCO2, 0.01 in pH units, and 1.5 Torr in end-tidal PCO2. Thus the of CO2 hydration in plasma is not a significant factor in ventilatory control.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online