Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 48: 337-346, 1980;
8750-7587/80 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fordyce, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Grodins, F. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fordyce, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Grodins, F. S.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 48, Issue 2 337-346, Copyright © 1980 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Ventilatory responses to intravenous and airway CO2 administration in anesthetized dogs

W. E. Fordyce and F. S. Grodins

The ventilatory responses to steady-state venous CO2 loading (iv CO2) and CO2 inhalation have been observed in chloralose-urethan-anesthetized dogs. Intravenous CO2 was administered by increasing the CO2 fraction of gas ventilating a membrane gas exchanger in an arteriovenous bypass; blood flow rate was fixed at 30 ml/min. During the study, we identified a time-dependent hyperventilation in all 14 experimentally treated dogs and in 4 additional sham-treated dogs. When we tested 8 of these animals with a protocol having small progressive increments in iv CO2 loading rate, we observed a response approaching isocapnia during iv CO2 and a large hypocapnia when we returned to control conditions. The use of a randomized protocol in 6 animals demonstrated the necessity of accounting for this systematic base-line shift, because before doing so the response depended more on the passage of time than on the nature of the CO2 load. After this analytical adjustment was made, there was no significant difference between the respiratory controller gains (delta nu E/delta Paco2) for inhaled and iv CO2.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online