Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 48: 41-44, 1980;
8750-7587/80 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glaser, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Suryaprasad, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glaser, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Suryaprasad, A. G.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 48, Issue 1 41-44, Copyright © 1980 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Applied physiology for wheelchair design

R. M. Glaser, M. N. Sawka, R. E. Young and A. G. Suryaprasad

The purpose of this study was to evaluate potential wheelchair design changes that may reduce operational energy cost and cardiopulmonary responses. Design changes, which were simulated with a wheelchair ergometer, allowed two techniques of hand-rim propulsion: the usual synchronous application of force (sync), and an asynchronous technique where force was applied one hand at a time in a reciprocal fashion (async). Three hand-rim drive ratios were also simulated: low, normal, and high. Combinations of these force application-drive ratio simulations were evaluated at power output (PO) levels of 30 and 60 kpm.min-1. The async-high combination was found to elicit significantly lower (P less than 0.01) gross caloric output, pulmonary ventilation, and heart rate values, and provide the greatest advantage over conventional sync-normal operation at both PO levels. It appeared that async propulsion and high drive ratio resulted in less wasted movements. Although the async-high combination was superior under these test conditions, other combinations may be necessary to better match various locomotive tasks to individuals of different capabilities.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Clin RehabilHome page
G. Mukherjee, P. Bhowmik, and A. Samanta
Physical fitness training for wheelchair ambulation by the arm crank propulsion technique
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2001; 15(2): 125 - 132.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 ptjournalHome page
C. E Beekman, L. Miller-Porter, and M. Schoneberger
Energy Cost of Propulsion in Standard and Ultralight Wheelchairs in People With Spinal Cord Injuries
Physical Therapy, February 1, 1999; 79(2): 146 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online