Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 47: 874-881, 1979;
8750-7587/79 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hedenstierna, G.
Right arrow Articles by Santesson, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hedenstierna, G.
Right arrow Articles by Santesson, J.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 47, Issue 4 874-881, Copyright © 1979 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Airway closure during anesthesia: a comparison between resident-gas and argon-bolus techniques

G. Hedenstierna and J. Santesson

Airway closure was measured in awake and then anesthetized supine healthy subjects with the argon-bolus and the resident-gas (nitrogen) techniques simultaneously. The preinspiratory lung volume for the closing volume maneuver was varied from residual volume to closing capacity (CC). Comparative measurements were also performed in the upright and supine positions in awake subjects. Closing volume (CV) was consistently larger with the bolus technique in supine subjects both when awake and when anesthetized (difference between methods 0.1--0.2 l, P less than 0.01), whereas no difference between the methods was noted in upright subjects. The lower "nitrogen CV" in supine subjects may be due to a shorter vertical lung height with a smaller range of nitrogen concentrations, resulting in a less abrupt onset of phase IV (taken to indicate CV). CV was not significantly affected by the preinspiratory lung volume with either technique, and CC was unchanged when anesthesia was instituted. Functional residual capacity (FRC) was reduced with anesthesia (mean reduction: 0.6 l, P less than 0.01) and FRC-CC became negative in all subjects with either technique. This implies intermittent or continuous airway closure during anesthesia and the possibility of increased venous admixture.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online