Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 47: 51-58, 1979;
8750-7587/79 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Habib, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Engel, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Habib, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Engel, L. A.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 47, Issue 1 51-58, Copyright © 1979 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Variability of airway responses to inhaled histamine in normal subjects

M. P. Habib, P. D. Pare and L. A. Engel

Dose-response curves to inhaled histamine were studied in 12 normal subjects. Pulmonary resistance (RL) and dynamic compliance (Cdyn) were measured during tidal breathing, and maximum expiratory flow rates, at an absolute lung volume corresponding to 40% of control vital capacity, were obtained during forced expiration from tidal end inspiration (Vmax40p) and from total lung capacity (Vmax40c). Threshold was defined as the histamine dose at which a departure from the range of normal measurements was observed. RL and Vmax40p indicated lowest threshold values, which varied by a factor of 32 and 38, respectively. There was no correlation between reactivity, which reflects the slope of the dose-response curve beyond the threshold dose, and threshold doses, nor between the initial RL (normalized for lung volume) and either threshold or reactivity. In eight subjects, restudied on two occasions after 10 mg propranolol or after saline, injected in a double-blind manner, there was no change in the dose-response curves. These results indicate that different indices of bronchoconstriction may yield different dose-response curves and hence different sensitivities. In addition, a wide variation of airway responses to inhaled histamine exists in the normal population and beta-blockade does not influence this variability.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
J. G. Martin and T. Jo
Genetic Differences in Airway Smooth Muscle Function
Proceedings of the ATS, January 1, 2008; 5(1): 73 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
B. J. Canning
Reflex regulation of airway smooth muscle tone
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2006; 101(3): 971 - 985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Physiol.Home page
E. J. Oh, S. B. Mazzone, B. J. Canning, and D. Weinreich
Reflex regulation of airway sympathetic nerves in guinea-pigs
J. Physiol., June 1, 2006; 573(2): 549 - 564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
R. Crapo
Guidelines for Methacholine and Exercise Challenge Testing---1999 . THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY WAS ADOPTED BY THE ATS BOARD OF DIRECTORS, JULY 1999
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2000; 161(1): 309 - 329.
[Full Text]

Home page
 ThoraxHome page
S. Chinn
Methodology of bronchial responsiveness
Thorax, November 1, 1998; 53(11): 984 - 988.
[Full Text]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
R. H. BROWN, J. GEORGAKOPOULOS, and W. MITZNER
Individual Canine Airways Responsiveness to Aerosol Histamine and Methacholine in Vivo
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 1997; 157(2): 491 - 497.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online