Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 46: 927-931, 1979;
8750-7587/79 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lai, Y. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lai, Y. L.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 46, Issue 5 927-931, Copyright © 1979 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Lung volume and pleural pressure in the anesthetized hamster

Y. L. Lai

Lung volumes and respiratory pressures were measured in anesthetized male hamsters weighing an average 117 g. In 16 supine animals functional residual capacity (FRC) determined by body plethysmograph was 1.12 +/- 0.23 (SD) ml (about 20% total lung capacity, TLC) slightly and significantly larger than the FRC measured by saline displacement, 1.01 +/- 0.15 ml. Similar results were found in six prone animals. Paralysis did not significantly alter supine FRC. Contrary to published reports, pleural pressure (Ppl) estimated from esophageal pressure was negative at FRC. The fact that lung volume decreased by 0.2 ml (about 4% TLC) when the chest was opened at FRC provided additional evidence of negative Ppl at FRC. No consistent changes in the lung pressure-volume curve were found after the chest was opened. Deflation chest wall compliance just above FRC was about twice lung compliance. The vital capacity and reserve volumes in this study agreed with values reported in the literature. However, absolute lung volumes (TLC, FRC, and residual volume) were lower by about 1.4 ml, possibly because of earlier overestimates of box FRC.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online