Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 46: 885-889, 1979;
8750-7587/79 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bergh, U.
Right arrow Articles by Ekblom, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bergh, U.
Right arrow Articles by Ekblom, B.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 46, Issue 5 885-889, Copyright © 1979 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Physical performance and peak aerobic power at different body temperatures

U. Bergh and B. Ekblom

In eight male subjects we studied the effect of different core (esophageal, (Tes 34.9--38.4 degrees C) and muscle (Tm 35.1--39.3 degrees C) temperature on 1) physical performance (time to exhaustion at a standard maximal rate of work, WT), 2) aerobic power (VO2), 3) heart rate (HR), and 4) blood lactate (LA) concentration during exhaustive combined arm and leg exercise. In three subjects the effects at different mean skin temperatures (Tsk 27 and 31 degrees C, respectively) were also studied. Peak VO2 was positively correlated to both Tes (r = 0.88) and Tm (r = 0.91). None of the subjects attained control VO2max at Tes and Tm lower than 37.5 and 38.0 degrees C, respectively. HR was correlated to both Tes (r = 0.97) and Tm (r = 0.95). Different Tsk did not affect peak VO2 and HR at subnormal body temperatures. Pulmonary ventilation was independent of Tes and Tm in all experimental situations. LA was significantly higher at Tes 37.5 degrees C compared to both Tes 34.9 and 38.5 degrees C, respectively. At Tes less than 37.5 degrees C and Tm less than 38.0 degrees C, there was a linear reduction in WT (20%.degrees C-1), peak VO2 (5--6%.degrees C-1), and HR (8 beats.min-1.degrees C-1) with lowered Tes and Tm.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. T. White, S. L. Davis, and T. E. Wilson
Metabolic, thermoregulatory, and perceptual responses during exercise after lower vs. whole body precooling
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2003; 94(3): 1039 - 1044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
F E Marino
Methods, advantages, and limitations of body cooling for exercise performance
Br. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2002; 36(2): 89 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
L. Nybo, T. Jensen, B. Nielsen, and J. Gonzalez-Alonso
Effects of marked hyperthermia with and without dehydration on {V}O2 kinetics during intense exercise
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2001; 90(3): 1057 - 1064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online