Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 44: 483-487, 1978;
8750-7587/78 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Besch, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Leverett, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Besch, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Leverett, S. D., Jr

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 44, Issue 3 483-487, Copyright © 1978 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Calibration of a new ear oximeter in humans during exposure to centrifugation

E. L. Besch, F. W. Baumgardner, R. R. Burton, K. K. Gillingham, R. F. McPherson and S. D. Leverett Jr

An optoelectronic ear oximeter (Hewlett-Packard, model 47201A) was evaluated as a noninvasive method for determining arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) in human subjects during exposure to various levels of accelerative forces. This physiological calibration involved exposing five subjects, while breathing air and wearing the ear oximeter for 60 s to each of three levels of accelerative forces (3, 5, and 7 G); arterial blood samples were withdrawn concurrently. SaO2 was calculated indirectly from the oxygen tensions (PaO2) measured from the sampled arterial blood with a blood gas analyzer and corrected for pH and base excess. These data were compared, as were similar data taken from the same subjects breathing three different hypoxic gas mixtures while resitng at earth's gravity (1 G). Regression analyses of these data for both experimental groups (a, G exposure, or b, hypoxic exposure), comparing the ear-oximeter SaO2 with the calculated SaO2, showed the ear oximeter to be accurate with correlation coefficients of 0.95 and 0.98, respectively.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online