Journal of Applied Physiology Virginia Commonwealth University
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 42: 514-518, 1977;
8750-7587/77 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sargeant, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, C. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sargeant, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, C. T.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 42, Issue 4 514-518, Copyright © 1977 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Forces applied to cranks of a bicycle ergometer during one- and two-leg cycling

A. J. Sargeant and C. T. Davies

An examination was made of the comparability of one- and two-leg exercise performed pedaling a stationary bicycle ergometer. The pattern of force exerted on both cranks was examined by means of a specially adapted ergometer which is described. The mean of the peak force in each cycle (MPF) was linearly related to work load (W) in both forms of exercise, and if account was taken of the doubled work output in two-leg cycling there was no significant difference between the MPF/W relationships; these are given by the equations one-leg: MPF (kg) = 11.23 + 0.065 (W in kpm/min) two-leg MPF (kg) = 10.76 + 0.032 (W in kpm/min). Calculation from the force records of the work performed on the cranks (WCR net) showed good agreement (r = 0.98, P less than 0.001) with the work load set on the ergometer. Analysis of the proportion of work done in leg extension and flexion phases of cycling revealed no differences between one- and two-leg exercise or between the right and left legs. The majority (approximately 80%) of Wer net being performed in leg extension is described by: Wer net (extension)) = 10.6 +/- 0.8 (W cr net total). In one-leg exercise (W greater than 900 kpm/min) the variation in rotation speed during a normal cycle ranged from +20 to --30% of the mean speed compared with +/- 10% in two-leg exercise.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
M. W. Bundle, C. L. Ernst, M. J. Bellizzi, S. Wright, and P. G. Weyand
A metabolic basis for impaired muscle force production and neuromuscular compensation during sprint cycling
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): R1457 - R1464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. Koga, T. J. Barstow, T. Shiojiri, T. Takaishi, Y. Fukuba, N. Kondo, M. Shibasaki, and D. C. Poole
Effect of muscle mass on {V}O2 kinetics at the onset of work
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2001; 90(2): 461 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online