Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 42: 221-227, 1977;
8750-7587/77 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R.
Right arrow Articles by McFadden, E. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R.
Right arrow Articles by McFadden, E. R., Jr

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 42, Issue 2 221-227, Copyright © 1977 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effects of intravenous histamine on pulmonary mechanics in nonasthmatic and asthmatic subjects

R. Brown, R. H. Ingram Jr, J. J. Wellman and E. R. McFadden Jr

Histamine is thought to be one of the primary mediators of the airways response in allergic asthma. We have studied in detail in nonasthmatic and asthmatic volunteers the effects of its intravenous infusion on pulmonary mechanics. The doses used were similar in both groups and limited by vascular rather than pulmonary effects. Measurements were made of lung resistance, the subdivisions of lung volume, maximal flow, density dependence, lung elastic recoil and dynamic compliance. The only mean group changes were a decrease in dynamic compliance and increase in frequency dependence of compliance in the nonasthmatics. Although in nonasthmatic individuals, statistically significant changes occasionally occurred in some parameters, the response was variable on repeated studies and sufficiently small to be of questionable physiological significance. Some of the asthmatics developed larger changes, but these only occurred in those individuals whose preinfusion pulmonary function was abnormal. Our results suggest the possibility that altered prechallenge pulmonary function rather than an unusual sensitivity to histamine may determine the greater responses observed in asthmatics.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online