Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 40: 982-983, 1976;
8750-7587/76 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kasch, F. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hurl, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kasch, F. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hurl, P. M.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 40, Issue 6 982-983, Copyright © 1976 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

VO2max during horizontal and inclined treadmill running

F. W. Kasch, J. P. Wallace, R. R. Huhn, L. A. Krogh and P. M. Hurl

The VO2max response of 12 well-trained and highly motivated college males was measured using two treadmill protocols: horizontal (H) and inclined (I). The duration of each test averaged 10 min. In the H test the treadmill bed was horizontal with the running rate held constant for the first 6 min, after which time it was increased at 1-min intervals to near maximal subject running speed, according to the HR response, until exhaustion. The I method simulated the protocol of Costill and Fox, with the treadmill speed at about 80-90% of mean maximal running rate established from 12- and 15-min track runs. The treadmill bed was held horizontal during the first 4 min, after which time it was elevated to 4% and elevated 2% each 2 min thereafter until exhaustion. No significant differences were found in VO2max, 4.267 1/min (I), and 4.192 1/min (H), average max HR, 190.4/MIN (I), and 188.9/min (H); respiratory rate, 56.4/min (I), and 62.0/min (H); and VEBTPS, 145.2 1/min (I), and 143.3 1/min (H). It was concluded that the intensities of both treadmill methods, H and I, were sufficient to produce a nonsignificant difference in maximal VO2 values with the type subjects employed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. R. Bolster, M. A. Pikosky, P. C. Gaine, W. Martin, R. R. Wolfe, K. D. Tipton, D. Maclean, C. M. Maresh, and N. R. Rodriguez
Dietary protein intake impacts human skeletal muscle protein fractional synthetic rates after endurance exercise
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2005; 289(4): E678 - E683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
P. C. Gaine, C. T. Viesselman, M. A. Pikosky, W. F. Martin, L. E. Armstrong, L. S. Pescatello, and N. R. Rodriguez
Aerobic Exercise Training Decreases Leucine Oxidation at Rest in Healthy Adults
J. Nutr., May 1, 2005; 135(5): 1088 - 1092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online