Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 40: 1009-1011, 1976;
8750-7587/76 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marchand, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Knox, F. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marchand, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Knox, F. G.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 40, Issue 6 1009-1011, Copyright © 1976 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Comparison of proximal tubule fluid-to-plasma ultrafiltrate chloride ratio in rats and dogs

G. R. Marchand, C. E. Ott, J. L. Cuche and F. G. Knox

Previous studies in rats have demonstrated that the concentration of chloride in proximal tubule fluid is greater than that in plasma. The gradient reaches a free-flow steady-state level in the early proximal tubule and is maintained throughout the accessible proximal tubule. On the other hand, studies in dogs are in conflict regarding either the existence of a gradient or the development of a free-flow steady-state level. Since a species difference of tubule fluid to plasma chloride (TF/PC1) may exist, the present study was done to systematically compare the tubule fluid to ultrafiltrate chloride ratio (TF/UFC1) in hydropenic rats and dogs during normal acid-base balance. Chloride was analyzed by microelectrometric titration. In the rat the TFC1 and UFC1 concentrations were 139 +/- 1.4 and 120 +/- 1.2 meq/1, respectively. In the dog the TFC1 and UFC1 concentrations were 138 +/- 1.3 and 121 +/- 1.5 meq/1, respectively. Thus, there was no significant difference in the TF/UFC1 ratio between the rat (1.17 +/- 0.02) and the dog (1.14 +/- 0.01). Furthermore, regression analysis indicates that there is no correlation between TF/UFC1 and TF/PIn in either the rat or dog, which suggests that the gradient originates early in the proximal tubule and is maintained throughout the accessible proximal tubule in both species.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online