Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 40: 196-205, 1976;
8750-7587/76 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abel, F. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abel, F. L.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 40, Issue 2 196-205, Copyright © 1976 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Comparative evaluation of pressure and time factors in estimating left ventricular performance

F. L. Abel

Left ventricular and ascending aortic pressures were measured in open chest mongrel dogs under pentobarbital anesthesia. The data were digitized, averaged, and subgrouped by mean systolic aortic pressures (MSAP), end-diastolic pressure (EDP), and heart rate (HR). Seven raw and 32 derived variable from the pressure, as a function of time, wave forms were analyzed in each subgroup in the control state and following the infusion of catecholamines. A plot of control variability versus sensitivity to norepinephrine indicates that time to peak ventricular pressure (PVP time) is a more sensitive indicator of changes in the inotropic state than such other commonly used variables as max dP/dt, integrated isometric tension, and (max dP/dt)/developed pressure. PVP time also showed less variability with HR, EDP, and MSAP. Regression lines were also fit to the data using a second-order model. This permitted evaluation of experimentally varying either HR, EDP, or MSAP while maintaining the other two constant. PVP time was again one of the better variables in terms of sensitivity to HR, EDP, or MSAP. Vmax, fractional rate of change of power, preejection period, and systolic time were also analyzed and compared with PVP time using averaged data.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online