Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 39: 1022-1033, 1975;
8750-7587/75 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ganesan, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bass, H. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ganesan, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bass, H. B.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 39, Issue 6 1022-1033, Copyright © 1975 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Purified postheparin plasma lipoprotein lipase in primary hyperlipoproteinemias

D. Ganesan, R. H. Bradford, G. Ganesan, W. J. McConathy, P. Alaupovic and H. B. Bass

Purified postheparin plasma lipoprotein lipase (LPL) of normolipidemic and primary hyperlipoproteinemic subjects was characterized by lipoprotein C polypeptide activation and specificity for triglycerides in chylomicrons and VLDL. Chromatography of normal LPL on Sephadex G-100 resulted in two protein peaks, LPLC-1 (activated by C-I but not C-II) and LPLC-II (activated by C-II but not C-I). LPL from type I hyperlipoproteinemic subjects was not activated by C-I and C-II activation was reduced to 40% of control. Hydrolysis of chylomicron and VLDL triglycerides was severely impaired. Although chromatography of type I LPL resulted in two protein peaks, the protein peak corresponding to LPLC-I did not exhibit lipolytic activity and LPLC-II was reduced to 50% of control in protein and enzyme specific activity. Type III LPL was normal in respect to LPLC-I while LPLC-II averaged 40% of control. Hydrolysis of chylomicron and VLDL was reduced to 50% and 10% of control, respectively. An etiological implication for LPLC-I and/or LPLC-II in type I and III hyperlipoproteinemias is suggested.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online