Journal of Applied Physiology Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 39: 523-534, 1975;
8750-7587/75 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peslin, R.
Right arrow Articles by Richalet, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peslin, R.
Right arrow Articles by Richalet, J.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 39, Issue 4 523-534, Copyright © 1975 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Frequency response of the chest: modeling and parameter estimation

R. Peslin, J. Papon, C. Duviver and J. Richalet

The frequency response of the respiratory system was studied in the range from 3 to 70 Hz in 15 normal subjects by applying sinusoidal pressure variations around the chest and measuring gas flow at the mouth. The observed input-output relationships were systematically compared to those predicted on the basis of linear differential equations of increasing order. From 3 to 20 Hz the behavior of the system was best described by a 3rd-order equation, and from 3 to 50 Hz by a 4th-order one. A mechanistic model of the 4th order, featuring tissue compliance (Ct), resistance (Rt) and inertance (It), alveolar gas compressibility (Cg) and airway resistance (Raw), and inertance (Iaw) was developed. Using that model, the following mean values were found: Ct = 2.08-10(-2)1-hPa-1 (1 hPa congruent to 1 cm of water); Rt = 1.10-hPa-1(-1)-s; It = 0.21-10(-2)hPa-1(-1)-s2; Raw = 1.35-hPa-1(-1)-s; Iaw = 2.55-10(-2)hPa-1(-1)-s2. Additional experiments devised to validate the model were reasonably successful, suggesting that the physical meaning attributed to the coefficients was correct. The validity of the assumptions and the physiological meaning of the coefficients are discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. Thamrin, P. D. Sly, and Z. Hantos
Broadband frequency dependence of respiratory impedance in rats
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2005; 99(4): 1364 - 1371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
W. Tomalak, R. Peslin, and C. Duvivier
Respiratory tissue properties derived from flow transfer function in healthy humans
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 1997; 82(4): 1098 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online