Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 39: 9-17, 1975;
8750-7587/75 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vawter, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by West, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vawter, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by West, J. B.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 39, Issue 1 9-17, Copyright © 1975 by American Physiological Society

ARTICLES

Effect of shape and size of lung and chest wall on stresses in the lung

D. L. Vawter, F. L. Matthews and J. B. West

Conflicting results have been reported on the changes in the distribution of pleural pressures caused by alterations of chest shape. To understand better the effect of shape and size of lung and chest wall on the distribution of stresses, strains, and surface pressures, we analyzed a theoretical model using the technique of finite elements. The study was in two parts. First we investigated the effects of changing the chest wall shape during expansion, and second we studied lungs of a variety of inherent shapes and sizes. We found that, in general, the distributions of alveolar size, mechanical stresses, and surface pressures in the lungs were dominated by the weight of the lung and that changing the shape of the lung or chest wall had relatively little effect. Only at high states of expansion where the lung was very stiff did changing the shape of the chest wall cause substantial changes. Altering the inherent shape of the lung generally had little effect but the topographical differences in stresses and surface pressures were approximately proportional to lung height. The results are generally consistent with those found in dog by Hoppin et al. (J. Appl. Physiol. 27: 863-873, 1969).


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
S. E. Sinclair, R. C. Molthen, S. T. Haworth, C. A. Dawson, and C. M. Waters
Airway Strain during Mechanical Ventilation in an Intact Animal Model
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 15, 2007; 176(8): 786 - 794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online