Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 38: 1161-1164, 1975;
8750-7587/75 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hollis, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Castell, D. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hollis, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Castell, D. O.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 38, Issue 6 1161-1164, Copyright © 1975 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effect of dry swallows and wet swallows of different volumes on esophageal peristalsis

J. B. Hollis and D. O. Castell

The effect of dry swallows and wet swallows of various volumes on esophageal function was studied in normal subjects. An intraesophageal transducer assembly was used to measure the dynamics of esophageal peristalsis. The strength of esophageal contraction (amplitude) following a 1-ml liquid bolus was similar to that following a dry swallow but was significantly less than that following a wet swallow of a larger volume. There was no difference in strength of esophageal squeeze following swallows ranging from 2 to 20 ml. In addition, a wet swallow was associated with slower wave speed, greater duration of the contraction wave, and later time of appearance of the peristaltic wave in the distal esophagus than a dry swallow. Futhermore, the incidence of peristalsis was greater with a wet swallow than a dry swallow. The results of our studies indicate that although the act of swallowing alone in man initiates peristalsis, afferent information contributes to the regulation of primary peristalsis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
A. Jean
Brain Stem Control of Swallowing: Neuronal Network and Cellular Mechanisms
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2001; 81(2): 929 - 969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
R. Srinivasan, M. F. Vela, P. O. Katz, R. Tutuian, J. A. Castell, and D. O. Castell
Esophageal function testing using multichannel intraluminal impedance
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, March 1, 2001; 280(3): G457 - G462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
E. Bardan, P. Xie, M. Aslam, M. Kern, and R. Shaker
Disruption of primary and secondary esophageal peristalsis by afferent stimulation
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, August 1, 2000; 279(2): G255 - G261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online