Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 38: 1148-1152, 1975;
8750-7587/75 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, S.
Right arrow Articles by Frank, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, S.
Right arrow Articles by Frank, R.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 38, Issue 6 1148-1152, Copyright © 1975 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Lung volumes, mechanics, and single-breath diffusing capacity in anesthetized cats

S. Watanabe and R. Frank

We measured lung weight, lung volumes, pulmonary mechanics, and carbon monoxide transfer (DLCO, single-breath method) in healthy cats (3.3 +/- 0.4 kg) that were anesthetized, paralyzed, and mechanically ventilated through a tracheal cannula. Compared with Stahl's predicted values which were based on regression analyses of data collected from several species, our cats had larger and more compliant lungs in relation to body weight, higher DLCO per unit body weight, and similar DLCO/TLC (size independent constant). Compared with Robinson et al.'s values derived entirely from studies on dogs, our cats had significantly smaller lung volumes and DLCO per unit body weight, DLCO/TLC and similar ratios of CL/FRC. Several factors appear to contribute to the functional variations among mammalian species: differences in the relation of lung to body weight, differences in the relation of chest wall compliance to lung compliance, and differences in the fundamental structure and design of the respiratory systems. Differences in methodology are acknowledged to be an additional factor.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online