Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 38: 752-756, 1975;
8750-7587/75 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jirak, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Coufalov, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jirak, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Coufalov, H.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 38, Issue 4 752-756, Copyright © 1975 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Correction factors in skin temperature measurement

Z. Jirak, M. Jokl, J. Stverak, R. Pechlat and H. Coufalov

In 14 persons the skin temperature has been measured by means of thermistor thermometer. The influence of the shape of the probe and the pressure exerted on the resulting value of the skin temperature has been proved. In 10 additional men the relation of the temperature difference (deltaT) to the exerted pressure (P) was determined, the regression equations were derived for relation deltaT/P, and the correlation coefficients for recalculation of the temperatures measured by thermistor thermometer with the pressure exerted 20 g to values determined by thermovision. The skin temperature values determined by thermography were used in 24 formulas (3-16 points) for calculation of mean skin temperature. The differences of the means in determining the optimal method (16 points) were evaluated by the t-test and by the percentage expression of aggrement for criteria plus or minus 0.1, plus or minus 0.2, plus or minus 0.5, and plus or minus 0.1 degrees C. For precise laboratory work 10 points of measurement are recommended; for measurement in the field 6 points of measurement are enough. Orientational measurement can be performed very well by means of Ramanathan method (4 points).


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Textile Research JournalHome page
M. J.T. Norton, S. J. Kadolph, R. F. Johnson, and K. A. Jordan
Design, Construction, and Use of Minnesota Woman, A Thermally Instrumented Mannequin
Textile Research Journal, January 1, 1985; 55(1): 5 - 12.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Textile Research JournalHome page
M. J.T. Norton, R. F. Johnson, and K. A. Jordan
Assessment of Flammability Hazard and Its Relationship to Price for Women's Nightgowns
Textile Research Journal, November 1, 1984; 54(11): 748 - 760.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online