Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 38: 546-549, 1975;
8750-7587/75 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaudebout, C.
Right arrow Articles by Blayo, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaudebout, C.
Right arrow Articles by Blayo, M. C.

Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol 38, Issue 3 546-549, Copyright © 1975 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Assessment of Scholander micromethod for gas concentrations versus weighing method

C. Gaudebout and M. C. Blayo

Three gaseous mixtures in N2, of varying concentrations of CO2 (3.60, 5.79, and 9.36%) and O2 (22.18, 15.12, and 6.82%), respectively, were prepared by precise weighings, which may serve as absolute measures. These mixtures were analyzed with two apparatuses by the Scholander micromethod. Taking into account the influence of several factors (apparatuses, order of analyses, etc, it appears that differences between apparatuses were not significant in five of six cases and the effect of order was significant in O2 (P less than 0.01) but not in CO2 for the set of measurements. When compared with weighings, measurements differed only in one apparatus (P less than 0.02) in two of six cases and by no more than 0.02%. The relation between weighings and measurements was highly significant (P less than 10(-9) and no lack of fit to linearity occurs. Side effects of the factors considered and interactions between them are discussed. In conclusion, the micromethod of Scholander gives accurate results, in very good agreement with the reference values provided that certain technical precautions are observed.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online