Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 18: 1171-1179, 1963;
8750-7587/63 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wood, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by Baldes, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wood, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by Baldes, E. J.

Effect of partial immersion in water on response of healthy men to headward acceleration

Earl H. Wood 1, Evan F. Lindberg 1, Charles F. Code 1, and Edward J. Baldes 1

1 Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota

Protection against the effects of headward acceleration afforded by immersion in water has been assayed in the human centrifuge on 15 trained subjects. Immersion in water to the xyphoid afforded an average protection of 1.1 ± 0.1 G for vision and ear opacity and of 1.6 ± 0.2 G for ear pulse and heart rate. Deeper immersion, to the level of the third rib at the sternum increased the protection to 1.8 ± 0.1 G for vision and ear opacity and to 2.8 ± 0.2 G for ear pulse and heart rate. The protection afforded the various physiologic variables increased with the magnitude of acceleration tested. Protection against loss of consciousness may be greater than protection against blackout and is probably similar to the protection afforded the ear pulse and heart rate. The cardiovascular reactions produced by headward acceleration are qualitatively similar with and without water immersion. This finding does not support the concept that impediment to venous return is the primary determinant of man's tolerance to headward acceleration. Visual symptoms occurred at greater amplitudes of ear pulse, and presumably also at greater blood pressures at head level, during water immersion than during control runs.

vision; arterial pressure; heart rate; venous return; arterial pulse in ear

Submitted on May 13, 1963







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online