Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 18: 794-797, 1963;
8750-7587/63 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ross, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by King, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ross, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by King, L. H., JR.

Relationship of increased breath-holding diffusing capacity to ventilation in exercise

Joseph C. Ross 1, Ronald W. Reinhart 1, John F. Boxell 1, and Leroy H. King JR. 1

1 Department of Medicine and Heart Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana

Pulmonary diffusing capacity (Dl), as measured by all techniques, increases with exercise possibly due to an increase in the volume of blood in pulmonary capillaries (Vc), but the mechanism for the latter is not known. Previous studies have indicated that the steady-state Dl can be increased by hyperventilation alone, enough possibly to account for the increase in Dl as measured by this method with exercise. On the other hand, breath-holding Dl is not increased by voluntary hyperventilation preceding the measurement. The present study was carried out to determine whether or not the increase in ventilation rate is a necessary part of a combination of factors which account for the rise in Dl during exercise. In this study breath-holding Dl was measured in five subjects. All of the five subjects studied had an increase in Dl during exercise when ventilation was voluntarily restrained to the resting level, and the mean increase was as great as the mean increase during the same amount of exercise with normal unrestricted breathing. The increase in Dl when breathing was restricted during exercise could not be accounted for by differences in alveolar volumes or by differences in alveolar O2 and CO2 tensions in the two situations. This study demonstrates that increase in ventilation preceding the measurement is not a determinant of the increase in breath-holding Dl with exercise

Submitted on January 7, 1963







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online