Journal of Applied Physiology Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 18: 789-793, 1963;
8750-7587/63 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rohter, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hyman, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rohter, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hyman, C.

Exercise blood flow changes in the human forearm during physical training

Frank D. Rohter 1, Rene H. Rochelle 1, and Chester Hyman 1

1 Research Laboratories, University of California, Santa Barbara, and Department of Physiology, University of Southern California Medical School, Los Angeles, California

Forearm blood flow measurements were made with a venous occlusion plethysmograph on six competitive swimmers and six control subjects at rest and during a prescribed rhythmic exercise throughout a 13-week training and detraining program. The swimmers' mean exercise forearm blood flow increased progressively during the training program, reaching a maximum at the peak of training toward the end of the 5th week, after which it decreased to near posttraining levels during the period of detraining. The increase in the swimmer's exercise flow between the 1st week of training (4.02 ± 0.59 ml/100 ml min) and the 5th week of training (6.40 ± 0.56 ml/100 ml min) was statistically significant; their decrease in mean exercise blood flow during the 3rd week of detraining (4.70 ± 0.24 ml/100 ml min) was also statistically significant. There was no significant change in the swimmers' resting blood flow; nor were there significant changes in either the exercise or the resting blood flows of the control group. The technique for measuring blood flow in the forearm during rhythmic exercise is explained.

Submitted on December 11, 1962







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online