Journal of Applied Physiology Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 18: 742-745, 1963;
8750-7587/63 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mohammed, S.
Right arrow Articles by Eckstein, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mohammed, S.
Right arrow Articles by Eckstein, J. W.

Thermal indicator sampling and injection sites for cardiac output

Shakil Mohammed 1, Charles J. Imig 1, Elisha J. Greenfield 1, and John W. Eckstein 1

1 Departments of Physiology and Internal Medicine, State University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa

The effects of indicator sampling and injection sites on estimation of cardiac output by the thermal dilution method were investigated in dogs. Dilution curves were recorded simultaneously with thermistors in the aortic arch and carotid or femoral artery after injection of indicator into the right atrium. The outputs calculated from carotid and femoral curves were higher than those from aortic curves. Nevertheless, the carotid and femoral arteries were considered satisfactory sampling sites because it was possible to predict aortic values from peripheral curves with a small range of error. The effect of indicator injection sites was studied by comparing outputs calculated from aortic curves after alternate injections into the right atrium and external jugular vein. The outputs calculated after jugular injections were higher. The external jugular vein was considered to be a less desirable injection site because the correlation between aortic values obtained after injections into the two sites was relatively low, and the predictability of one value from the other was not good.

Submitted on January 14, 1963







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online