Journal of Applied Physiology Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 17: 259-262, 1962;
8750-7587/62 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ross, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Forster, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ross, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Forster, R. E.

Influence of pressure suit inflation on pulmonary diffusing capacity in man

Joseph C. Ross 1, Glen D. Ley 1, Ronald F. Coburn 1, J. L. Eller 1, and Robert E. Forster 1

1 Department of Physiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Department of Medicine, Indiana University, School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana

Previous investigations of the effect of inflation of a pressure suit on pulmonary diffusing capacity (DL) have been reported from our two laboratories, one (Indianapolis) finding an increase and the other (Philadelphia) finding no change. The present investigation was carried out in Philadelphia, using some of the same subjects and pressure suits in order to reconcile the contradictory results. The earlier contradictory results were confirmed. The pressure suit used in the investigations at Philadelphia (suit P) covered the entire body below the nipples, whereas the suit used in the investigations at Indianapolis (suit I) extended cephalad only as far as the costal margin. When suit P was inflated in the present study, DL again did not increase significantly in two subjects. However, when the upper part of the suit was folded down so that the thoracic cage was not covered, inflation of the suit did produce a significant increase in DL. Inflation of suit P when it covered the chest made it difficult for a subject not to perform a Valsalva maneuver during breath holding and caused more decrease in alveolar volume (Va) than when it was inflated in the folded-down position. In two subjects studied, we found no difference in air trapping with inflation of suit P in the two positions. The discrepancy between the results of the two earlier studies appears to have resulted from the different construction of the two pressure suits used. We conclude that pressure suit inflation in man will produce an increase in DL, presumably by means of pulmonary congestion.

Submitted on September 22, 1961







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online