Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 16: 679-683, 1961;
8750-7587/61 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Reed, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Reed, L. C., JR.

Effect of uneven ventilation on pulmonary diffusing capacity

Benjamin M. Lewis 1, E. J. Hayford-Welsing 1, Akio Furusho 1, and L. C. Reed JR. 1

1 Pulmonary Function Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Wayne State University; and Detroit Receiving Hospital, Detroit, Michigan

In four normal subjects measurements of steady state diffusing capacity for CO (DLCO) by an alveolar sample technique and of the degree of uneven ventilation by nitrogen washout were made simultaneously followed by measurement of DLCO by rebreathing. A methacholine-histamine aerosol was then given. After this aerosol uneven ventilation worsened and steady state DLCO fell, while rebreathing DLCO did not change. Relief of uneven ventilation by isoproterenol was followed by increase of steady state DLCO in two subjects. Alterations in rate and depth of breathing or changes in functional residual capacity do not explain the changes in steady state DLCO which are attributed to increase in uneven ventilation as predicted by the theory of CO absorption. Theory also predicts a lack of effect of uneven ventilation on the rebreathing DLCO, but these results must be accepted with caution because deep breathing may reverse the effects of the methacholine-histamine aerosol and O2 consumption during rebreathing rises after this aerosol.

Submitted on December 30, 1960







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online