Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 16: 655-659, 1961;
8750-7587/61 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Senay, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hertzman, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Senay, L. C., JR.
Right arrow Articles by Hertzman, A. B.

Cutaneous vasodilatation elicited by body heating in calf, forearm, cheek, and ear

Leo C. Senay JR. 1, Margaret Christensen 1, and Alrick B. Hertzman 1

1 Department of Physiology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri

When seminude subjects were exposed to a slowly rising ambient temperature (25–45 C), the onset of cutaneous vasodilatation occurred simultaneously in the calf, forearm, cheek, and ear, and the further progress of the vasodilatation was similar in the last three regions. That in the calf and toe often differed from that in the forearm. Either the vasodilatation in the calf was small or it stabilized early while the forearm vessels continued to dilate markedly. One subject repeatedly presented an exception in that a marked vasodilatation in the calf considerably exceeded that in the forearm. He was a poor sweater and exhibited unusually high skin temperatures. The usual failure of the skin temperature to rise as much in the calf as in the forearm appeared to be closely related to the lesser cutaneous vasodilatation. There was no evidence that local sweating elicited local vasodilatation; on the contrary, evaporative cooling seemed to decrease the vasodilatation, particularly in the calf. The cutaneous vascular events were followed continuously in each region by means of photoelectric plethysmography.

Submitted on December 27, 1960







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online