Journal of Applied Physiology AJP citation statistics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 16: 11-14, 1961;
8750-7587/61 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hornbein, T. F.
Right arrow Articles by Griffo, Z. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hornbein, T. F.
Right arrow Articles by Griffo, Z. J.

Transient effect of sudden mild hypoxia on respiration

Thomas F. Hornbein 1, Albert Roos 1, and Zora J. Griffo 1

1 Laboratory of Thoracic Physiology, Department of Surgery: the Division of Anesthesiology; and Department of Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

Recent studies of carotid body chemoreceptor activity in cats show that the activity of these organs increases markedly over a range of alveolar pO2 considerably higher than the alveolar pO2 of 50–60 mm Hg known to produce an increase in ventilation in the steady state. In an attempt to explain this discrepancy between chemoreceptor activity and ventilation, the transient ventilatory response to two breaths of a low O2 mixture was observed and correlated with the alveolar pO2 during this brief hypoxic stimulus. A transient increase in ventilation could be detected at an alveolar pO2 of 93 mm Hg, that is, considerably higher than the highest pO2 known to increase ventilation during the steady state. These findings are interpreted as evidence of an increased chemoreceptor drive when alveolar O2 tension is lowered only slightly below that existing at sea level. Possible reasons for the difference between the steady state and transient responses are discussed.

Submitted on June 6, 1960




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
W. R. Mower, C. Sachs, E. L. Nicklin, and L. J. Baraff
Pulse Oximetry as a Fifth Pediatric Vital Sign
Pediatrics, May 1, 1997; 99(5): 681 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online