Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 15: 987-991, 1960;
8750-7587/60 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kenshalo, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kenshalo, D. R.

Comparison of thermal sensitivity of the forehead, lip, conjunctiva and cornea

D. R. Kenshalo 1

1 Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

The cornea is innervated by bare nerve endings of greater density than skin. If these act as thermal receptors, the cornea should be more sensitive to thermal stimulation than skin because of its dense innervation, surface proximity of the nerve terminals and absence of vascular system. Comparisons were made of the thermal sensitivities of the upper lip, forehead, conjunctiva and cornea. Although no thermal sensations were obtained from the cornea by applications of temperatures ranging from 20° to 55°C, all observers reported sensation changes at certain points on the temperature continuum. These were described in terms of irritation, whereas similar temperatures applied to the other sites felt cool, warm or hot. Comparison of the cool, warm and hot thresholds of the lip, forehead and conjunctiva showed them to be generally similar (P > 0.05). Stimulus temperatures at which corneal sensations changed were significantly different (P < 0.002) from the thresholds obtained at the other test sites. It is concluded that the cornea differs both quantitatively and qualitatively in its response to thermal stimulation from the other regions tested.

Note:
(With the Assistance of B. P. Childers and R. Webb)

Submitted on June 10, 1960




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
F Stapleton, M E Tan, E B Papas, K Ehrmann, B Golebiowski, J Vega, and B A Holden
Corneal and conjunctival sensitivity to air stimuli
Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2004; 88(12): 1547 - 1551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. C. Acosta, M. E. Tan, C. Belmonte, and J. Gallar
Sensations Evoked by Selective Mechanical, Chemical, and Thermal Stimulation of the Conjunctiva and Cornea
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2001; 42(9): 2063 - 2067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Malick, R. M. Strassman, and R. Burstein
Trigeminohypothalamic and Reticulohypothalamic Tract Neurons in the Upper Cervical Spinal Cord and Caudal Medulla of the Rat
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2000; 84(4): 2078 - 2112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. Hirata, S. Takeshita, J. W. Hu, and D. A. Bereiter
Cornea-Responsive Medullary Dorsal Horn Neurons: Modulation by Local Opioids and Projections to Thalamus and Brain Stem
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2000; 84(2): 1050 - 1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. Hirata, J. W. Hu, and D. A. Bereiter
Responses of Medullary Dorsal Horn Neurons to Corneal Stimulation by CO2 Pulses in the Rat
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1999; 82(5): 2092 - 2107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. Carstens, N. Kuenzler, and H. O. Handwerker
Activation of Neurons in Rat Trigeminal Subnucleus Caudalis by Different Irritant Chemicals Applied to Oral or Ocular Mucosa
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1998; 80(2): 465 - 492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. D. Meng, J. W. Hu, A. P. Benetti, and D. A. Bereiter
Encoding of Corneal Input in Two Distinct Regions of the Spinal Trigeminal Nucleus in the Rat: Cutaneous Receptive Field Properties, Responses to Thermal and Chemical Stimulation, Modulation by Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Controls, and Projections to the Parabrachial Area
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 1997; 77(1): 43 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online