Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 15: 1007-1014, 1960;
8750-7587/60 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bobbert, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bobbert, A. C.

Physiological comparison of three types of ergometry

A. C. Bobbert 1

1 Department for Occupational Medicine, Netherlands Institute for Preventive Medicine, Leiden, Netherlands

A physiological comparison of cycling, cranking and walking has been made, using in all experiments the same subjects and methods. In cycling and cranking energy expenditure increases with work load in a rectilinear way, the energy expenditures being always higher in cranking. In treadmill walking energy expenditure per kilogram of body weight rises curvilinearly both with increasing speed and grade. In cycling, cranking and walking there are nearly the same relations between heart rate and metabolism. Ventilation in cranking always exceeds that in walking and cycling at the same level of oxygen consumption. The curve of ventilation versus oxygen consumption shows a steeper rise in cranking. In level and grade walking ventilation increases curvilinearly with oxygen consumption.

Submitted on September 17, 1959




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
F. J. MARTINEZ, R. L. STRAWDERMAN, K. R. FLAHERTY, M. COWAN, J. B. ORENS, and J. WALD
Respiratory Response during Arm Elevation in Isolated Diaphragm Weakness
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 1999; 160(2): 480 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online