Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 14: 1000-1004, 1959;
8750-7587/59 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sendroy, J.
Right arrow Articles by Cecchini, L. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sendroy, J., JR.
Right arrow Articles by Cecchini, L. P.

Indirect estimation of body surface area and volume

Julius Sendroy JR. 1 and Louis P. Cecchini 1

1 Division of Chemistry, U.S. Naval Medical Research Institute, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland

A convenient and rapid photographic technique of obtaining data which can be used for the calculation of human body surface area is described. The results, which are in good agreement with values obtained by a reliable method of readings from a chart, provide additional support for the application of the increasingly important photographic method of quantitation in human biology. Data have also been obtained which suggest that the surface area of dogs may satisfactorily be estimated by the same previously reported chart method used for human beings. Empirical equations for the calculation of body volume (and density) in man, based essentially on measurements of weight and height, have been developed and tested in respect to measured values obtainable from the literature. Statistical evaluation and the criteria of convenience and rapidity in use, rather than more restrictive theoretical considerations, indicate the superiority of predominantly empirical relationships as the methods of choice for the prediction of body volume. Comparison of the reliability of the results with those obtainable by established methods of quantitation indicates that these equations may be useful as approximate, but most convenient indices of gross body composition.

Submitted on April 1, 1959







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online