Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 14: 789-797, 1959;
8750-7587/59 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fleischner, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sargent, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fleischner, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sargent, F., II

Effects of heat and cold on the albino rat: crossed resistance or crossed sensitization?

Jerry Robert Fleischner 1 and Frederick Sargent II 1

1 Department of Physiology and Physical Environment Unit, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois

Two experiments were carried out to test whether or not cold-acclimatized rats adjust better to heat and heat-acclimatized rats adjust better to cold than rats not previously exposed to either environmental extreme. In both, groups of rats were exposed to 94.5°–96.5°F (hot), 33°–40°F (cold) and 76°–78°F (control). In the first experiment 45 female Holtzman littermates were used. After 50 days, ‘hot’ rats were abruptly transferred to cold, ‘cold’ rats to heat. Control animals were also placed in each environment. In the second experiment 55 identical rats were similarly treated; the cross, however, was made after 29 days. Rats exposed to 95°F exhibited sustained hypothermia. Rats exposed to 36°F developed a transient hypothermia which lasted longer in the first experiment than in the second and was accompanied by more severe cold injury. Heat was not a stress in the sense of Selye, but cold was. There was crossed sensitization rather than crossed resistance.

Submitted on January 26, 1959







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online