Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 14: 625-628, 1959;
8750-7587/59 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Banerjee, S.
Right arrow Articles by Acharya, K. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Banerjee, S.
Right arrow Articles by Acharya, K. N.

Energy metabolism in laboratory workers

Sachchidananda Banerjee 1, Rabindra Nath Sen 1, and Keshav Narayan Acharya 1

1 Department of Physiology, Presidency College, Calcutta, India

Energy expenditure during different activities of 11 laboratory workers was determined by measurement of oxygen consumption. The energy cost of various activities expressed as Calories per m2 body surface per hour were as follows: BMR 30.87 ± 0.741; lying rest 34.79 ± 0.578; sitting rest 36.61 ± 2.927; standing rest 41.24 ± 1.323; sitting study 42.85 ± 1.034; sitting work 46.79 ± 3.036; standing laboratory work 59.96 ± 3.937; standing household work 61.78 ± 3.675; walking 122.06 ± 6.25; ascending stairs 159.94 ± 5.610 and descending stairs 95.80 ± 6.3. The total daily energy expenditure of the subjects, determined for a period of 7 days, varied between 1620 and 2967 Cal. The average food actually consumed by the subjects was analyzed for fat, protein and carbohydrate to determine the calorific value. The intake varied between 1680 and 2928 Cal/day. Most of the subjects were in apparent positive caloric balance but caloric intake was probably overestimated because no correction was made for the caloric value of the excreta.

Submitted on October 21, 1958







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online