Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 14: 276-278, 1959;
8750-7587/59 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buettner, K. J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Holmes, F. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buettner, K. J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Holmes, F. F.

Diffusion of water vapor through human skin in hot environment and with application of atropine

Konrad J. K. Buettner 1 and Frederick F. Holmes 1

1 Departments of Meteorology and Climatology and of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

At room temperatures between 20° and 40°C, vapor transfer through skin of human forearm was tested with four small heated bottles containing air of humidities ranging from 2 to 100% relative humidity. Exposure times ranging from 30 to 120 minutes had no influence on results. Water loss or gain of skin were observed for the different bottles. At very high humidities, liquid water deposit on the skin was measured by weighing a blotter. Skin vapor loss decreases systematically when bottle moisture increases. This increase is enhanced at room temperatures above 24°C, where total loss into a dry bottle increases more than fivefold. This increase seems only partially caused by sweat and partially by a decrease of the skin diffusion resistance. Tourniquet and locally applied atropine did not affect vapor transfer in a cool room. In a hot room, the tourniquet lowered the vapor loss by only 20%, whereas atropine drastically curtailed vapor loss.

Submitted on August 25, 1958




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. Pehek, H. Kyler, and D. Faust
Image modulation in corona discharge photography
Science, October 15, 1976; 194(4262): 263 - 270.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online