Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 11: 169-173, 1957;
8750-7587/57 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Starr, I.
Right arrow Articles by Schild, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Starr, I.
Right arrow Articles by Schild, A.

Studies Made by Simulating Systole at Necropsy. IX. A Test of the Aortic Compression Chamber Hypothesis and of Two Stroke Volume Methods Based Upon It

Isaac Starr 1 and Albert Schild 1

1 From the Department of Therapeutic Research, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Data secured by simulating systole at necropsy have been used to assess two methods of estimating cardiac stroke volume, that of Wezler and Böger, and that of Broemser and Ranke. The correlation between estimates made by each of these methods and the true stroke volumes is highly significant. One is not significantly better than the other. Neither method is highly accurate. Both detect changes in stroke volumes in individuals much better than differences in stroke volume between individuals. In our most arteriosclerotic subject the Wezler and Böger method gives results which are too high; in the remaining subjects the method works much better. The hypothesis of the aortic compression chamber, on which these methods are based, has been examined in two ways. First, when accurate measurements of the aorta, made at necropsy after our experiments had been completed, were substituted for the indirect estimates of aortic size usually employed, the accuracy of the estimates of stroke volume was diminished. Second, when those parts of the equations representing the dimensions of the compression chamber were removed from both formulae, estimates made from the remaining part, common to both formulae, correlate with the true stroke volumes better than before. Therefore, our data do not support the compression chamber hypothesis, in accordance with which these methods were designed.

Submitted on May 14, 1956







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online