Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 11: 79-83, 1957;
8750-7587/57 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Specht, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, R. G., JR.
Right arrow Articles by Specht, H.

Maximum Breathing Capacity With Various Expiratory and Inspiratory Resistances (Single and Combined) at Various Breathing Rates

R. G. Bartlett JR. 1 and H. Specht 1

1 From the National Institute of Arthritis and Metabolic Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

The maximum breathing capacity (MBC) has been determined with various expiratory and inspiratory resistances (singly and combined) at breathing rates of 4–196 per minute. A given resistance in the inspiratory duct reduced the MBC more than when it was in the expiratory duct. At low resistance levels, the combined resistances lowered the MBC little more than the inspiratory resistance alone. At higher resistance levels the effect of inspiratory and expiratory resistances were more nearly additive. The breathing rate at which the highest MBC occurred was lowered by increasing the resistance. Thus it was about 100 breaths per minute at the lowest resistance level and about 40 breaths per minute at the highest resistance level. The relationship was such that the tidal volume was the same at the highest MBC at each resistance level. The MBC increased rapidly over the lower breathing rates and fell off slowly at rates of over 120. Because a fourfold increase in the expiratory airway resistance lowered the MBC little, it was concluded that special low resistance testing equipment was not necessary for the normal subject.

Note:
with the assistance of Howard Brubach and Pierce Gardner

Submitted on November 29, 1956







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online