HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 106/3/950    most recent 91365.2008v1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smith, J. L. Articles by Gandevia, S. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smith, J. L. Articles by Gandevia, S. C.

Signals of motor command bias joint position sense in the presence of feedback from proprioceptors

¹Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute and University of New South Wales, and ²Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales; and ³Department of Physiology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Submitted 14 October 2008 ; accepted in final form 30 December 2008

Joint position sense is believed to be mediated by muscle afferent signals. Because a "phantom" hand produced by a sensory and motor nerve block appears to move in the direction of voluntary effort, signals of "motor command" or "effort" can influence perceived joint position. To determine whether this occurs when sensory signals are available, three studies assessed position sense when motor command and afferent signals were available, but joint movement was prevented. First, the hand was positioned to stop movement at the proximal joint of the middle finger, and movement at the distal joint was impossible because the muscles had been "disengaged". Voluntary efforts produced illusory position changes in the direction of the effort (12.6 ± 2.0° distal joint; 12.3 ± 2.3° proximal joint for efforts at 30% maximum; means ± SD). Second, when subjects attempted to move the index finger under isometric conditions, the index finger appeared to move 7.4 ± 1.2° in the direction of efforts. These illusions graded with the level of effort (10 or 30% maximum) and far exceeded any real joint movement. Finally, because changes in muscle afferent feedback might have accompanied the voluntary efforts, all forearm and hand muscles were completely paralyzed by locally infused rocuronium. During paralysis, passive wrist position was signaled accurately, but, during attempted efforts (30% maximum), perceived wrist position changed by 9.7 ± 4.9°. Before paralysis, isometric efforts changed it by 6.7 ± 3.6°. Thus all studies concur: when joint movement is prevented, signals of motor command contribute to joint position sense.

proprioception; kinesthesia; motor command

This article has been cited by other articles:

				U. Proske and S. C. Gandevia The kinaesthetic senses J. Physiol., September 1, 2009; 587(17): 4139 - 4146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Thyrion and J.-P. Roll Perceptual Integration of Illusory and Imagined Kinesthetic Images J. Neurosci., July 1, 2009; 29(26): 8483 - 8492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]