HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 106/2/701    most recent 01051.2007v1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Verges, S. Articles by Millet, G. Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Verges, S. Articles by Millet, G. Y.

HIGHLIGHTED TOPIC
The Physiology and Pathophysiology of the Hyperbaric and Diving Environments

Comparison of electrical and magnetic stimulations to assess quadriceps muscle function

¹REX-S laboratory, Joseph Fourier University and Exercise Research Unit, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France; ²Neuromuscular Research Laboratory, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland; ³ Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France

Submitted 20 October 2007 ; accepted in final form 19 August 2008

This study aimed to 1) compare electrical and magnetic stimulations for quadriceps muscle function assessment, and 2) ascertain whether the ratios of the second twitch elicited by supramaximal electrical and magnetic femoral nerve stimulation at 10 and 100 Hz (T2_10:100) and the total twitch force elicited by the same types of stimulations (Fpaired_10:100) are equivalent to the standard low- to high-frequency force ratio associated with submaximal electrical tetanic stimulations (Ftet_10:100). Quadriceps force and vastus lateralis EMG were recorded at rest (n = 21 subjects), immediately after, and 30 min after a 30-min downhill run (n = 10) when 1) supramaximal electrical nerve stimulation (ENS), 2) magnetic nerve stimulation (MNS) and 3) submaximal electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) were delivered in random order at 1 (single stimulation), 10, and 100 Hz (paired stimulations). Ten- and 100-Hz 500-ms tetani were also evoked with EMS to determine Ftet_10:100. Before exercise, contractile properties with single and paired stimulations were similar for ENS and MNS (all intraclass correlation coefficients k > 0.90), but smaller for EMS (P < 0.001). M-wave characteristics were also similar for ENS and MNS (all k > 0.90). After exercise, changes in all parameters did not differ between methods. With fatigue, the changes in Ftet_10:100 were inconsistently correlated with the changes in T2_10:100 (r² = 0.24–0.73, P = 0.002–0.15) but better correlated with the changes in Fpaired_10:100 (immediately after exercise: r² = 0.80–0.83, P < 0.001; 30 min after exercise: r² = 0.46–0.82, P = 0.001–0.03). We conclude that ENS and MNS provide similar quadriceps muscle function assessment, while Fpaired_10:100 is a better index than T2_10:100 of low- to high-frequency fatigue of the quadriceps in vivo.

nerve stimulation; M-wave; contractile properties; low-frequency fatigue

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Gagnon, D. Saey, I. Vivodtzev, L. Laviolette, V. Mainguy, J. Milot, S. Provencher, and F. Maltais Impact of preinduced quadriceps fatigue on exercise response in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and healthy subjects J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2009; 107(3): 832 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]