Journal of Applied Physiology Millar Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 106: 486-493, 2009. First published November 26, 2008; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90795.2008
8750-7587/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/2/486    most recent
90795.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hawkins, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Raven, P. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hawkins, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Raven, P. B.

The effects of aerobic fitness and β1-adrenergic receptor blockade on cardiac work during dynamic exercise

Megan N. Hawkins, Quinton Barnes, Sushmita Purkayastha, Wendy Eubank, Shigehiko Ogoh, and Peter B. Raven

Department of Integrative Physiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas

Submitted 20 June 2008 ; accepted in final form 19 November 2008

The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether cardiovascular adaptations characteristic of long-term endurance exercise compensate more effectively during cardioselective β1-adrenergic receptor blockade-induced reductions in sympathoadrenergic-stimulated contractility. Endurance-trained (ET) athletes (n = 8) and average-trained (AT; n = 8) subjects performed submaximal cycling exercise at moderate [45% maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max)] and heavy (70% VO2max) workloads, with and without metoprolol. Cardiac output (Qc), heart rate (HR), and systolic blood pressure were recorded at rest and during exercise. Cardiac work was calculated from the triple product of HR, stroke volume, and systolic blood pressure, and myocardial efficiency is represented as cardiac work for a given total body oxygen consumption. Metoprolol reduced Qc at 45% VO2max (P = 0.004) and 70% VO2max (P = 0.022) in ET subjects, but did not alter Qc in the AT subjects. In ET subjects at 45% VO2max, metoprolol-induced reductions in Qc were a result of decreases in HR (P < 0.05) and the absence of a compensatory increase in stroke volume (P > 0.05). The cardiac work and calculated cardiac efficiency were reduced with metoprolol in ET subjects at both exercise intensities and in the AT subjects during the high-intensity workload (P < 0.01). The cardiac work and the calculated cardiac efficiency were not affected by metoprolol in the AT subjects during the 45% VO2max exercise. Therefore, in AT subjects, β-blockade reduced the amount of pressure generation necessary to produce the same amount of work during moderate-intensity exercise. In patients with heart disease receiving metoprolol, a decrease in the generation of cardiac pressure necessary to perform a given amount of work during mild-to-moderate exercise would prove to be beneficial.

Frank-Starling mechanism; cardiac output; cardiac efficiency; acetylene rebreathe; exercise-induced cardiac hypertrophy



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. Hawkins, Dept. of Physical Therapy, Univ. of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9174 (e-mail: megan.hawkins{at}utsouthwestern.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
L. M. Hanft and K. S. McDonald
Sarcomere length dependence of power output is increased after PKA treatment in rat cardiac myocytes
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2009; 296(5): H1524 - H1531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the American Physiological Society.