Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 105: 977-987, 2008. First published July 17, 2008; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00094.2008
8750-7587/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/3/977    most recent
00094.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Corder, K.
Right arrow Articles by Brage, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Corder, K.
Right arrow Articles by Brage, S.

REVIEW

HIGHLIGHTED TOPIC
Biology of Physical Activity in Youth

Assessment of physical activity in youth

Kirsten Corder, Ulf Ekelund, Rebekah M. Steele, Nicholas J. Wareham, and Søren Brage

Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Submitted 29 January 2008 ; accepted in final form 17 July 2008

ABSTRACT

Despite much progress with physical activity assessment, the limitations concerning the accurate measurement of physical activity are often amplified in young people due to the cognitive, physiological, and biomechanical changes that occur during natural growth as well as a more intermittent pattern of habitual physical activity in youth compared with adults. This mini-review describes and compares methods to assess habitual physical activity in youth and discusses main issues regarding the use and interpretation of data collected with these techniques. Self-report instruments and movement sensing are currently the most frequently used methods for the assessment of physical activity in epidemiological research; others include heart rate monitoring and multisensor systems. Habitual energy expenditure can be estimated from these input measures with varying degree of uncertainty. Nonlinear modeling techniques, using accelerometry perhaps in combination with physiological parameters like heart rate or temperature, have the greatest potential for increasing the prediction accuracy of habitual physical activity energy expenditure. Although multisensor systems may be more accurate, this must be balanced against feasibility, a balance that shifts with technological and scientific advances and should be considered at the beginning of every new study.

measurement; self-report; pedometry; accelerometry; heart rate



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. Brage, MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, Box 285, Addenbrooke's Hospital CB2 0QQ Cambridge, UK (e-mail: soren.brage{at}mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
T. Rowland and B. Saltin
Learning from children: the emergence of pediatric exercise science
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2008; 105(1): 322 - 324.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.