Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 105: 811-815, 2008. First published July 17, 2008; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90304.2008
8750-7587/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/3/811    most recent
90304.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Groothuis, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Hopman, M. T. E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Groothuis, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Hopman, M. T. E.

Leg intravenous pressure during head-up tilt

Jan T. Groothuis,1,5 Fleur Poelkens,1,2 Constantijn W. Wouters,3,4 Miriam Kooijman,1,5 and Maria T. E. Hopman1

Departments of 1Physiology, 2Internal Medicine, 3Pharmacology-Toxicology, and 4Cardiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre; and 5Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Submitted 21 February 2008 ; accepted in final form 10 July 2008

Leg vascular resistance is calculated as the arterial-venous pressure gradient divided by blood flow. During orthostatic challenges it is assumed that the hydrostatic pressure contributes equally to leg arterial, as well as to leg venous pressure. Because of venous valves, one may question whether, during orthostatic challenges, a continuous hydrostatic column is formed and if leg venous pressure is equal to the hydrostatic pressure. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to measure intravenous pressure in the great saphenous vein of 12 healthy individuals during 30° and 70° head-up tilt and compare this with the calculated hydrostatic pressure. The height difference between the heart and the right medial malleolus level represented the hydrostatic column. The results demonstrate that there were no differences between the measured intravenous pressure and the calculated hydrostatic pressure during 30° (47.2 ± 1.0 and 46.9 ± 1.5 mmHg, respectively) and 70° head-up tilt (83.9 ± 0.9 and 85.1 ± 1.2 mmHg, respectively). Steady-state levels of intravenous pressure were reached after 95 ± 12 s during 30° and 161 ± 15 s during 70° head-up tilt. In conclusion, the measured leg venous pressure is similar to the calculated hydrostatic pressure during orthostatic challenges. Therefore, the assumption that hydrostatic pressure contributes equally to leg arterial as well as to leg venous pressure during orthostatic challenges can be made.

venous pressure; hydrostatic pressure; leg vascular resistance



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. T. E. Hopman, Radboud Univ. Nijmegen Medical Centre, Dept. of Physiology, Geert Grooteplein-noord 21, 6525 EZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands (e-mail: M.Hopman{at}fysiol.umcn.nl)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.