Journal of Applied Physiology Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 105: 282-292, 2008. First published May 8, 2008; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01190.2007
8750-7587/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/1/282    most recent
01190.2007v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pyke, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Tschakovsky, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pyke, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Tschakovsky, M. E.

Are the dynamic response characteristics of brachial artery flow-mediated dilation sensitive to the magnitude of increase in shear stimulus?

K. E. Pyke, J. A. Hartnett, and M. E. Tschakovsky

Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Submitted 8 November 2007 ; accepted in final form 6 May 2008

The purpose of this study was to determine the dynamic characteristics of brachial artery dilation in response to step increases in shear stress [flow-mediated dilation (FMD)]. Brachial artery diameter (BAD) and mean blood velocity (MBV) (Doppler ultrasound) were obtained in 15 healthy subjects. Step increases in MBV at two shear stimulus magnitudes were investigated: large (L; maximal MBV attainable), and small (S; MBV at 50% of the large step). Increase in shear rate (estimate of shear stress: MBV/BAD) was 76.8 ± 15.6 s–1 for L and 41.4 ± 8.7 s–1 for S. The peak %FMD was 14.5 ± 3.8% for L and 5.7 ± 2.1% for S (P < 0.001). Both the L (all subjects) and the S step trials (12 of 15 subjects) elicited a biphasic diameter response with a fast initial phase (phase I) followed by a slower final phase. Relative contribution of phase I to total FMD when two phases occurred was not sensitive to shear rate magnitude (r2 = 0.003, slope P = 0.775). Parameters quantifying the dynamics of the FMD response [time delay (TD), time constant ({tau})] were also not sensitive to shear rate magnitude for both phases (phase I: TD r2 = 0.03, slope P = 0.376, {tau} r2 = 0.04, slope P = 0.261; final phase: TD r2 = 0.07, slope P = 0.169, {tau} r2 = 0.07, slope P = 0.996). These data support the existence of two distinct mechanisms, or sets of mechanisms, in the human conduit artery FMD response that are proportionally sensitive to shear stimulus magnitude and whose dynamic response is not sensitive to shear stimulus magnitude.

Doppler ultrasound; hyperemia; endothelium



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. E. Tschakovsky, Associate Professor, Human Vascular Control Laboratory, School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's Univ., Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada (e-mail: mt29{at}queensu.ca)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
B. A. Parker, T. L. Trehearn, and J. R. Meendering
Pick your Poiseuille: normalizing the shear stimulus in studies of flow-mediated dilation
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2009; 107(4): 1357 - 1359.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.