HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 104/5/1381    most recent 01348.2007v1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Brown, R. H. Articles by Mitzner, W. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brown, R. H. Articles by Mitzner, W.

Temporal variability in the responses of individual canine airways to methacholine

Departments of ¹Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, ²Environmental Health Sciences, ³Radiology, ⁴Biomedical Engineering, ⁵Biostatistics, and ⁶Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

Submitted 19 December 2007 ; accepted in final form 25 February 2008

Previous work showed that individual airway size, before any spasmogen, varied widely in the same animals on different days. The effect of this variable baseline size on the airway response to a subsequent challenge is unknown. The present study examined how the variability in individual airway baseline size in dogs was related to that after methacholine challenge on 4 different days using high-resolution computed tomography scans. Dogs were anesthetized and ventilated, and on 4 separate days randomly varying between 1 and 8 wk apart, baseline scans were acquired, followed by a continuous intravenous infusion of methacholine at three rates in increasing order (17, 67, and 200 µg/min). As the measure of variability, we used the coefficient of variation (CV) of the four airway luminal measurements of each airway at baseline and at each dose of methacholine. For most airways, there was wide variability both between and within dogs in the response to a given dose of methacholine (CV = 33–38%). Airways with any level of methacholine stimulation had greater variability than those at baseline. The airway variability was greatest at the lowest dose of methacholine administered but was elevated at all the doses. In conclusion, there was substantial day-to-day variability in baseline airway size. Most importantly, the same dose of methacholine to the same individual airway showed even greater variability than that at baseline. If we consider that increased heterogeneity may potentiate clinical symptoms, then airway response variability may play an important role in the manifestation of airway disease.

airway smooth muscle; asthma; heterogeneity; vagal tone; airway responsiveness