Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 103: 1950-1957, 2007. First published October 11, 2007; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00452.2007
8750-7587/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
103/6/1950    most recent
00452.2007v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gonzales, J. U.
Right arrow Articles by Scheuermann, B. W.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gonzales, J. U.
Right arrow Articles by Scheuermann, B. W.

Forearm blood flow follows work rate during submaximal dynamic forearm exercise independent of sex

Joaquin U. Gonzales, Benjamin C. Thompson, John R. Thistlethwaite, Allison J. Harper, and Barry W. Scheuermann

Cardiopulmonary and Metabolism Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, The University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio

Submitted 26 April 2007 ; accepted in final form 5 October 2007

To test the hypothesis that sex influences forearm blood flow (FBF) during exercise, 15 women and 16 men of similar age [women 24.3 ± 4.0 (SD) vs. men 24.9 ± 4.5 yr] but different forearm muscle strength (women 290.7 ± 44.4 vs. men 509.6 ± 97.8 N; P < 0.05) performed dynamic handgrip exercise as the same absolute workload was increased in a ramp function (0.25 W/min). Task failure was defined as the inability to maintain contraction rate. Blood pressure and FBF were measured on separate arms during exercise by auscultation and Doppler ultrasound, respectively. Muscle strength was positively correlated with endurance time (r = 0.72, P < 0.01) such that women had a shorter time to task failure than men (450.5 ± 113.0 vs. 831.3 ± 272.9 s; P < 0.05). However, the percentage of maximal handgrip strength achieved at task failure was similar between sexes (14% maximum voluntary contraction). FBF was similar between women and men throughout exercise and at task failure (women 13.6 ± 5.3 vs. men 14.5 ± 4.9 ml·min–1·100 ml–1). Mean arterial pressure was lower in women at rest and during exercise; thus calculated forearm vascular conductance (FVC) was higher in women during exercise but similar between sexes at task failure (women 0.13 ± 0.05 vs. men 0.11 ± 0.04 ml·min–1·100 ml–1·mmHg–1). In conclusion, the similar FBF during exercise was achieved by a higher FVC in the presence of a lower MAP in women than men. Still, FBF remained coupled to work rate (and presumably metabolic demand) during exercise irrespective of sex.

sex differences; forearm blood flow; handgrip; vascular conductance



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: B. W. Scheuermann, Dept. of Kinesiology, MS 119, Health and Human Services Bldg., The Univ. of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606 (e-mail: barry.scheuermann{at}utoledo.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.