Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 103: 1929-1941, 2007. First published September 6, 2007; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00561.2007
8750-7587/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
103/6/1929    most recent
00561.2007v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Younes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hanly, P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Younes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hanly, P.

Mechanisms of breathing instability in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

Magdy Younes, Michele Ostrowski, Raj Atkar, John Laprairie, AnDrea Siemens, and Patrick Hanly

Sleep Centre, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Submitted 23 May 2007 ; accepted in final form 5 September 2007

The response to chemical stimuli (chemical responsiveness) and the increases in respiratory drive required for arousal (arousal threshold) and for opening the airway without arousal (effective recruitment threshold) are important determinants of ventilatory instability and, hence, severity of obstructive apnea. We measured these variables in 21 obstructive apnea patients (apnea-hypopnea index 91 ± 24 h–1) while on continuous-positive-airway pressure. During sleep, pressure was intermittently reduced (dial down) to induce severe hypopneas. Dial downs were done on room air and following {approx}30 s of breathing hypercapneic and/or hypoxic mixtures, which induced a range of ventilatory stimulation before dial down. Ventilation just before dial down and flow during dial down were measured. Chemical responsiveness, estimated as the percent increase in ventilation during the 5th breath following administration of 6% CO2 combined with {approx}4% desaturation, was large (187 ± 117%). Arousal threshold, estimated as the percent increase in ventilation associated with a 50% probability of arousal, ranged from 40% to >268% and was <120% in 12/21 patients, indicating that in many patients arousal occurs with modest changes in chemical drive. Effective recruitment threshold, estimated as percent increase in pre-dial-down ventilation associated with a significant increase in dial-down flow, ranged from zero to >174% and was <110% in 12/21 patients, indicating that in many patients reflex dilatation occurs with modest increases in drive. The two thresholds were not correlated. In most OSA patients, airway patency may be maintained with only modest increases in chemical drive, but instability results because of a low arousal threshold and a brisk increase in drive following brief reduction in alveolar ventilation.

mechanisms; dial down; effective recruitment threshold; arousal threshold



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. Younes, 405-435 Ellice Ave., Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3B 1Y6 (e-mail: mkyounes{at}shaw.ca)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PhysiologyHome page
Highlights From The Literature
Physiology, April 1, 2008; 23(2): 61 - 63.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.